Canadian Political Fairness
Many people feel they have just cause to voice anger at others in public forums or events. Some people counter-demonstrate at those events or online as well. I have seen officials media and local personalities attend those events increasing coverage to what looks like unlawful gatherings. I believe in Canadian Political Fairness.
In this climate of anger fear hate can we continue to accept this behavior without interruption? I don’t see anyone stepping in to the fray making a decision on what could become freedom of speech with its USA implications. I feel freedom of speech is good if it doesn’t interfere with the human rights of others.
The conservative party didn’t like the inclusiveness or lack of inclusiveness of the Islamophobia legislation M 103. It passed then the conservative party mostly stopped mentioning it except in questionnaires and surveys to find public opinion on where to place the campaign.
The candidate I support is against it but is not protesting how others feel during this time. I feel it may be repealed after consulting public opinion on how to make others feel included. Public opinion is in the forefront of the Andrew Scheer excitement.
Jason Kenney seemed to soften his public statements after acts of bad behavior and radicalism by those who were not part of his campaign. He seemed to support the Premier against hostile attacks on her personality. The attacks were totally uncalled for as he described them as being an attack on democracy itself. I wouldn’t support him if he didn’t feel that way.
Those are the only two public officials I would support that are looking for leadership positions in Canadian conservative politics. There are other hardworking conservative officials I support who are very media worthy hardworking elected officials though. As a mention Michelle Rempel is my favorite in media while there are many others as Rona steps away from Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada.
Brad Wall has become one of the most outspoken officials in Canada being both popular followed and on the other side of the coin sometimes controversial. Being controversial is most likely essential when opposing legislation which is the responsibility of elected officials. Causing political movements isn’t the mandate after election but discussing legislation in Parliament or the legislature is after consulting the public.
Direction for Canada
I have no doubt that this country is headed in the wrong direction if there isn’t good legislation on Islamophobia racism antisemitism or other cultural rights like religious observance. The Sikh community went through a dark period in recent Canadian history fighting for recognition of their turbans and kirpans. This even caused Sikhs to go against legislation within the RCMP.
Maybe with Andrew Scheer proposing freedom of Speech legislation which found a good way of addressing demonstrations on Canadian University campuses we can begin there. We may need broader response once and for all introducing legislation which would address freedom of speech which could accent and highlight the Canadian Charter of Rights.
On both of my blogs I don’t go against Canadian elected officials because I know that it isn’t the department of every official to perform the work not being done by the officials responsible. You only have the responsibility to represent your constituency if elected to office. I don’t believe we have villains in office as is being portrayed by some on social media who engage in threatening officials and supporters of those officials.
I have made mention on both of my blogs that I wish to be fair to all parties in my blog posts. So I will say this about the PM in as kind a way as I can. We are faced with global concerns which may not have time to address them all without hazarding a guess sometimes on dealing with these concerns. So far employment is said to rise by some media releases of official information which is somewhat challenged on social media.
Alberta isn’t doing well on employment or economy but I don’t feel the PM will phase out the oil sands. Pipeline construction will cause some employment for Alberta which is the responsibility of the Premier and the PM who may be doing this in response to conservative opposition. There aren’t personality attacks on the PM or Premier by real conservative officials.
The PM does seem to support strong action against bad behavior without putting it into public discussion. He is quiet about some things I support which he has taken action on including going against racism anti-Semitism supporting Islamophobia work and mentioning women’s rights a lot.
He is listening to the conservative opposition who do good work in Parliament causing him to be there quite often to vote and sit while most or all conservative MP’s are sitting. It would be tough to face that opposition. He most likely won’t make electoral changes or Phase out the oil sands with the opposition present as they are.
I don’t know about legalization of marijuana as a good practice except I leave that to officials and Health care professionals to consider. I won’t bother posting about too many topics on my blog because I don’t feel we are going to lose our democratic rights because of some feel for political balance in the Parliament.
Legislation is the responsibility of the officials that obtain office with the support of volunteers not kickbacks or bribes which is innuendo when fundraising takes place. It gets debated by political representatives fairly when they find out lapses in expenses as was known to face proper scrutiny during Prime Minister Harper’s time in office. Those officials cleared RCMP investigations on ethics.
All things are looked at and placed into media if it has its time and place for public consumption there isn’t any cover-ups. I like volunteering in politics if at all possible but at this time I am not available except to write on here a bit as well as post elsewhere. I don’t cause insult or injury to any person that believes in fairness and equity in jobs culture religion media and politics.
Ending this article today I feel we need to look at the public influence on leaders by bullying stalking and harassment. This can happen in a coffee shop with someone asking who you support when an article online or newspaper is mentioned. I have had this happen to me often when I would mention that I support the Conservative Party of Canada. The Public should be aware of Canadian Political Fairness.
As a political volunteer at that time I would attempt to say nice things about the opposition’s official being kind in general.I felt discriminated because of political belief often by those who just listened to the loudest argument.
My intention by blogging is to end those types of discussion or which to me is radical attempts to silence voters by those that may not even vote in elections. As I said I would be as kind as possible to the PM who I never felt that coming from his supporters in public places or if faced with canvassing door to door.
I would like legislation before the election of 2019 on how the public can interact on political topics without causing adversarial discussions. Public places should be safe from harassment of political belief religion culture gender etc.
Freedom of speech is necessary like Canadian Political fairness to being human in Canadian culture but we need to know tolerance and understanding may be necessary to include for those who don’t understand.